Latest news

« »

Monday, 19 October 2015

Less than half of countries apply minimum UN car safety standards - Global Ncap

Global Ncap, the road safety charity, reports the publication of the WHO's 2015 Global Status Report on Road Safety:
The World Health Organisation (WHO) is calling on governments around the world to apply the UN’s most important vehicle safety regulations. In its 2015 Global Status Report on Road Safety (published 19 October) the WHO reveals “worrying data showing that less than half of countries implement minimum standards” and warns that “Governments have a responsibility to take the steps needed to ensure their citizens have access to safe vehicles”.
Using seven priority vehicle safety standards recommended by Global NCAP, the WHO has carried out a unique survey on how they are currently being applied by governments around the world. The seven standards are from the UN’s World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations and cover seat belts, seat belt anchorages, front and side impact, electronic stability control, pedestrian protection and child seats. The results show that they are being fully applied by only 40 out of a total of 193 UN Member States and overwhelmingly by high-income countries. The Report argues that “there is an urgent need for these minimum vehicle standards to be implemented by every country”.
The WHO is worried that “these standards are notably absent in many of the large middle income countries that are major car manufacturers” now responsible for almost 50% of world passenger car production which reached a record level of 67 million units last year.
For example the WHO shows that the most important crash-worthiness regulations helping to protect occupants withstand front and side impact crashes “are poorly implemented globally”.
According to the report just 49 countries (27%) apply the UN frontal impact test regulation and 47 (26%) apply the side impact test regulation. Again these are predominantly high-income countries. The WHO is concerned that “in the absence of appropriate standards automobile companies are able to sell old designs no longer legal in well-regulated countries. Alternatively, they may “de-specify” life-saving technologies in newer models sold in countries where regulations are weak or non-existent”.
Citing the example of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) the WHO is concerned that global car manufacturers who are required to fit the system in high-income countries “can sell the same model to markets without this life saving technology if the country does not apply the ESC regulation”. To avoid such de-specification of safety technologies the WHO says ESC “should be mandatory in all vehicles”. Noting that the system is also effective in commercial vehicles (such as trucks, coaches and mini-buses) the WHO comments that “there is enormous life-saving potential for this technology across the world’s entire vehicle fleet that has yet to be tapped globally.”
The Status Report also highlights the role of New Car Assessment Programmes (NCAPs) in driving demand for safer cars. WHO says that NCAPs “are highly successful in promoting supply and demand for safer vehicles” and describes the work of the nine different organisations active in safety rating activities around the world. The WHO also spotlights Global NCAP’s support for new programmes in the rapidly motorising regions of Asia and Latin America.
The Status Report confirms that each year 1.25 million people die as a result of road traffic crashes. The WHO notes that the level of fatalities is stabilising but their Director General Dr Margaret Chan is concerned that “the pace of change is too slow”. In a foreword to the report Dr Chan warns “that across many measures, countries have not done enough to implement what we know works. As an example of inadequate policies, Dr Chan includes “vehicles sold in the majority of the world’s countries do not meet minimum safety standards”.
Commenting on the WHO’s Report, David Ward, the Secretary General of Global NCAP said:
“Global NCAP warmly welcomes the WHO’s call for action by governments to apply the most important vehicle safety standards. This is needed to democratise car safety so that car buyers everywhere have access to the same minimum levels of safety.
We also strongly endorse the WHO’s recognition of the life-saving potential of electronic stability control and support their call for its mandatory fitment. This vital crash avoidance system is a key focus of our new #STOPTHECRASH Partnership.
We are also pleased that the WHO recognises the contribution of NCAP’s as catalysts for action to improve vehicle safety supporting the UN’s Global Goals and the target to halve road deaths by 2020”.

Friday, 16 October 2015

Uber is legal in London

The HIgh Court judgment in Transport for London v Uber London Ltd [2015] EWHC 2918 (Admin) (16 October 2015) has been handed down today and can be read here.

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

DVSA fails to check MOT mileage accuracy | Auto Retail Network

DVSA fails to check MOT mileage accuracy | Auto Retail Network: "The DVSA does nothing to check the accuracy of mileage capture when a vehicle is subject to an MOT, a Freedom of Information Request by Auto Retail Agenda has discovered.

The lack of checks on data capture accuracy at MOT test stations makes it difficult to identify which cars have been clocked. "

'via Blog this'

VW SCANDAL: UK owners won't be hit with tax rise - Car Dealer Magazine

VW SCANDAL: UK owners won't be hit with tax rise - Car Dealer Magazine: my old friend Patrick McLoughlin, secretary of state for transport, has announced that the government won't be hitting owners of VWs with the notorious "defeat device" for higher levels of vehicle tax. Because tax levels are so dependent on emissions, there is certainly an argument for charging them more, but the government is showing solidarity with the rather battered owners - while saying it expects VW to support its customers.

'via Blog this'

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

US: Supreme court won’t hear dispute over Chrysler dealerships

High court won’t hear dispute over Chrysler dealerships, reports the Detroit News, although by "high" it seems to mean "Supreme". The would-be appeal arose from arbitrations which took place under state motor vehicle dealership laws, following the termination of a load of Chrysler dealers when the manufacturer went into bankruptcy a few years ago. In the case in question, a dealer took action to prevent an ex-dealer which had prevailed in arbitration being allowed to re-open.

The Supremes had previously declined to hear Fiat Chrysler's appeal against a ruling reinstating four former dealers. Both cases involve the important question (in the US system) of whether Federal law pre-empts state laws. Bankruptcy law is Federal while dealership laws are state laws.

'via Blog this'

Friday, 2 October 2015

Litigation funder backs VW shareholder action | News | Law Society Gazette

Litigation funder backs VW shareholder action | News | Law Society Gazette: "Litigation funder Bentham Europe has announced it will coordinate and back a shareholder action against Volkswagen in connection with the motor giant's emissions scandal"

'via Blog this'