The OFT points out that the decision highlights the need for credit businesses to check that when communicating with their customers they are clear and transparent and do not place undue pressure on the debtor. The Tribunal considered in particular that the company was not fit to hold a licence because:
- It lacked sufficient skills, knowledge and experience to operate a consumer debt collection business.
- It did not have practices or procedures to deal fairly and properly with consumers.
- The payment demand letter was designed to look like an official or legal document, against OFT guidance.
- The managing director described himself to debtors as a lawyer, which was intended to create a misleading impression.
- The company was persistently obstructive in dealing with enquiries from the OFT and Trading Standards.
No comments:
Post a Comment